Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Armin Azod et al v. James G. Robinson et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2022cv05214
Petitioner:
Armin Azod, Dr. Ramez Elgammal, Dr. Shantanu Sharma and others
Respondent:
James G. Robinson, Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., Cecilia, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Elgammal et al v. Morgan Creek Productions, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv05143
Plaintiff:
Dr. Ramez Elgammal, Dr Dong Zhang, Dr. Shantanu Sharma and others
Defendant:
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., Cecilia, LLC, Good Stuff LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv02018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cecilia LLC et al v. Armin Azod et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv09552
Respondent:
Ramez Elgammal, dong zhang, Armin Azod and others
Petitioner:
Morgan Creek Productions, Inc., James G. Robinson, Cecilia LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Joseph G Karmo v. Morgan Creek Entertainment Group et al
as 2:2018cv09148
Defendant:
Steven G. Bagatourian, Lenton T. Hutton, Eddie Gonzales and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph George Karmo
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Armin Azod et al v. James G. Robinson et al
as 2:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
Armin Azod, Peter John, Shantanu Sharma and others
Defendant:
Cecilia LLC, Morgan Creek Productions Inc and James G. Robinson
Brenda G. Robinson v. Michael J. Astrue
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2010cv08111
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. Robinson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.