Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00690
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Donald Sherrill et al v. George Edward Boston et al
as 8:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Donald Sherrill, Anthony DiPiero and Hunt and Henriques
Defendant:
George Edward Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
George Edward Hicks v. Ruffo Espinosa Jr. et al
as 2:2017cv09127
Defendant:
Ruffo Espinosa, Jr., Ruffo Espinosa, Jr., James Goldstein and others
Plaintiff:
George Edward Hicks
J and J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Chris Scott et al
as 5:2016cv00776
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Chris Scott and George Edward Scott
Broadcast Music Inc et al v. Copa Room LLC et al
as 2:2013cv04491
Plaintiff:
Amazement Music, Broadcast Music Inc, EMI Blackwood Music Inc and others
Defendant:
Christopher David Breed, Scott Tungfang Chen, Copa Room LLC and others
George Edward Ford et al v. Jeff Liberman et al
as 2:2013cv00341
Defendant:
Chief of Long Beach Police Department, City of Long Beach, Jeff Liberman and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Cooksie, George Edward Ford, Sr and George Edward Ford, II
George Edward Mixon v. CSP Los Angeles County et al
as 2:2012cv10187
Defendant:
R Brown, R Brown, CSP Los Angeles County and others
Plaintiff:
George Edward Mixon
George Edward Bush v. Deputy Ballantyne et al
as 5:2012cv00958
Defendant:
Deputy Ballantyne and San Bernardino Sheriff's Department
Plaintiff:
George Edward Bush
George Edward Ford II v. Domingo Uribe Jr. et al
as 2:2010cv03191
Respondent:
Gerry Brown and Domingo Uribe, Jr.
Petitioner:
George Edward Ford, II
George Edward Hicks v. Freddrick Haws
as 2:2009cv02051
Petitioner:
George Edward Hicks
Respondent:
Freddrick Haws
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
