Cases 1 - 10 of 13
McFarland v. Department of Veteran Affairs
as 2:2017cv07793
Defendant:
Melvin Wade, Sr., Bethel Missionary Baptist Church Inc., California Missionary State Baptist Convention and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony McFarland
In re David Richard Lusk
as 8:2016cv00930
Respondent:
In re David Richard Lusk
Petitioner:
Dwight D. Stirling
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
United States of America
Anthony McFarland v. Melvin Wade et al
as 2:2016cv01495
Defendant:
Bethel Missionary Baptist Church Inc., California Missionary State Baptist Convention, Department Of Veterans Affairs Health Care Systems and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony McFarland
Sean D. Lusk v. E. Valenzuela et al
as 2:2015cv06783
Defendant:
M. Denten and E. Valenzuela
Plaintiff:
Sean Dominguez Lusk
Stevie Bradford et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv05201
Plaintiff:
Pete Flores, Alfredo Jimenez, Wilmer Y Abar and others
Defendant:
ReconTrust Company NA, Bank of America, N.A., Does 1 through 100, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Injunctive/Declaratory Relief
Stevie Bradford et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv07188
Plaintiff:
20 Walter Lusk, Erlinda Abata, Othello Abata and others
Defendant:
Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Heather Roberts et al v. Infinity Insurance Company Inc et al
as 2:2012cv10471
Plaintiff:
David Burch, Kevin Collins, Maribel Lizarraga and others
Defendant:
Does and Infinity Insurance Company Inc
Richard W Lusk v. Mary L Kellogg et al
as 8:2011cv00087
Defendant:
Mary L Kellogg and Union Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Richard W Lusk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
