Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Singh v. United States of America
as 2:2022at00803
Petitioner: Surjit Singh
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) United States of America v. Cook (2255 - Criminal Case 2:19-cr-0124-TLN)
as 2:2021cv01661
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Marilyn Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Singh v. USA(2:12-CR-352 MCE DB)
as 2:2018cv01049
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Vincent Thakur Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Klipp v. USA 2:14-CR-107 GEB
as 2:2017cv01779
Petitioner: Joshua Landon Klipp
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. USA (2255-07-cr-0483 LKK)
as 2:2011cv02127
Petitioner: Charles Demario Johnson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
davis v. United States of America
as 2:2011at00927
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: DAngelo Domingo davis, Male
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Poole v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02596
Petitioner: Antonio B. Poole
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lawson v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv01905
Petitioner: Latoya Lawson
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andrew Felitt Bedenfield v. United States of America (2255 - 2:05-cr-125 MCE 1)
as 2:2009cv03406
Petitioner: Andrew Felitt Bedenfield
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Andrew Felitt Bedenfield v. United States of America (2255 - 2:05-cr-125 MCE-1)
as 2:2009cv03405
Petitioner: Andrew Felitt Bedenfield
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?