Cases 61 - 70 of 17,590
(HC) Saechao v. Cates
as 2:2024cv02178
Petitioner:
David Saechao
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Samm v. Jones
as 2:2024cv01987
Respondent:
Gena Jones
Petitioner:
Sterling Samm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Pollard v. St. Andre
as 2:2024cv01747
Respondent:
Rob St. Andre
Petitioner:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Johnson v. California Superior Court
as 2:2024cv02145
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
California Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lane v. Cates et al
as 2:2024cv01763
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lane
Respondent:
Brian Cates and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Thomas v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Edward Thomas
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Madi v. Acting Warden of USP Atwater et al
as 1:2024cv00925
Respondent:
Acting Warden of USP Atwater and C. Peters
Petitioner:
Andrew Joseph Madi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Thomas v. Horn
as 1:2024cv00926
Respondent:
Pat Horn
Petitioner:
Edward Noel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hatchett v. Clark
as 2:2024cv02135
Petitioner:
Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Brewer v. FCI Mendota, Warden
as 1:2024cv00918
Petitioner:
Stephen Alan Brewer
Respondent:
FCI Mendota Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
