Cases 21 - 30 of 105
(PC) Fox v. CDCR Secretary et al
as 1:2021cv01501
Plaintiff:
Freddy T. Fox
Defendant:
CDCR Secretary, Pallares, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Stith v. Darlene et al
as 2:2021cv01478
Plaintiff:
Theodore Ervin Stith
Defendant:
Secretary Darlene, Simmons and Darlene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) LeBlue v. CDCR et al
as 2:2021cv01389
Plaintiff:
Brandon LeBlue
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Secretary of CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Barnes v. Supreme Court Judges et al
as 1:2021cv01078
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Defendant:
Supreme Court Judges, Gavin Newsom, CDCR Secretary Prop 57 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Givens v. Lotesztain et al
as 1:2021cv00530
Defendant:
Dr. Mayes, Michael Gonzaga, Dr. N. Largoza and others
Plaintiff:
Francois P. Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Givens v. Lotesztain et al
as 2:2021cv00591
Defendant:
Dr. Mayes, Michael Gonzaga, Dr. N. Largoza and others
Plaintiff:
Francois P. Givens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Fields v. CDCR et al
as 2:2021cv00548
Defendant:
Warden of High Desert State Prison, Secretary of CDCR, Chief Medical Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Dwayne Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. Secretary et al
as 2:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Christopher Smith
Defendant:
Secretary and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Walker v. Secretary of Corrections, et al
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
M. Cole, Secretary of Corrections, E. Takehara and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Walker v. Gates et al
as 2:2020cv02338
Defendant:
Warden, Salinas Valley State Prison, N. Malakkla, A Abdulbasel and others
Plaintiff:
G. Daniel Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
