Cases 1 - 10 of 119
(PC) Van Huisen v. Nelson
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Bill Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
United States of America, Clinton Administration, K. Bieker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Schowachert v. Polley
as 1:2023cv01645
Plaintiff:
JohnPaul Schowachert
Defendant:
Bill Polley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Schowachert v. Polley
as 1:2023cv01579
Plaintiff:
John Paul Frank Schowachert
Defendant:
Bill Polley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Van Huisen v. Warner Bros et al
as 2:2023cv00975
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Warner Bros, US Air Force, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Temple v. Gibson et al
as 2:2023cv00478
Plaintiff:
Troy Alexander Temple
Defendant:
Michael Gibson, Imo Ebong, Martin Cadeiras and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
(PC) Sealey v. Cisneros et al
as 1:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Dean Martin Sealey
Defendant:
T. Cisneros, Bill Davidson, Steve and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Schowachert v. Polley
as 1:2022cv01249
Plaintiff:
John P. Schowachert
Defendant:
Bill Polley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Dunigan v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01713
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dunigan
Defendant:
Raybon C. Johnson, C.S.P. LA County, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Moore v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Sidni Alfred Moore
Defendant:
Rick Hill, L. Johnson, W. Critz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
