Cases 11 - 20 of 115
The CA Labor and Workforce Development Agency et al v. Compucom Systems, Inc.
as 2:2021cv02327
Plaintiff:
The California Labor and Workforce Development Agency and William Dean Raymond
Defendant:
Compucom Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. VibrantCare Rehabilitation, Inc.
as 2:2021cv01179
Plaintiff:
Colleen Williams
Defendant:
VibrantCare Rehabilitation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez v. Scanlon et al
as 2:2020at00982
Defendant:
William E Scanlon and SIERRA MOUNTAIN EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
Sigifredo Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Perez v. Sierra Mountain Express, Inc., et al
as 2:2020cv02003
Plaintiff:
Sigifredo Perez, Jr.
Defendant:
Sierra Mountain Express, Inc. and William E. Scanlon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020at00872
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cachola et al v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv01362
Plaintiff:
Rachel Goff, Pauline Mikhail, Saravie You and others
Defendant:
Garfield Beach CVS, LLC, CVS Health Corporation, CVS Rx Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PS) Bowman v. Hackney et al
as 2:2019cv00363
Defendant:
Nicole Williams, Rodney Hackney and Leonard Moore
Plaintiff:
Angelo Bowman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Krivolavek et al v. BeavEx Incorporated
as 1:2018cv01416
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gutierrez, William Krivolavek and Kosal Pech
Defendant:
BeavEx Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Krivolavek et al v. BeavEx Incorporated
as 1:2018at00755
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gutierrez, William Krivolavek and Kosal Pech
Defendant:
BeavEx Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
