Cases 11 - 20 of 247
(PC) Roberson v. Department of State Hospitals-Coalinga, et al.
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Maurice V Roberson and Maurice V. Roberson
Defendant:
Department of State Hospitals-Coalinga and Roxanne Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Lynch
as 2:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch and Gavin Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Rogers v. Lynch
as 2:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Maurice Di Aundra Rogers
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Davis v. Lynch
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Howes v. White et al
as 2:2022cv02047
Plaintiff:
Davon Maurice Howes
Defendant:
Claire Jacquline White, Robert S. Bowers and Elizabeth Ring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Godoy v. Los Angeles County et al
as 1:2022cv01302
Plaintiff:
Maurice Godoy, Sr.
Defendant:
Los Angeles County, Los Angeles Police Department and Stanley Lemelle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Bobbla
as 2:2022cv01658
Plaintiff:
Maurice Davonte Davis-Rogers, Maurice Daronte Davis and Maurice Daronte Davis-Rogers
Defendant:
Manjala Bobbla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Payton v. Montgomery
as 2:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
Norbert M. Payton and Norbert Maurice Payton
Defendant:
Correctional Officer and Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Uddin
as 2:2022cv00864
Plaintiff:
Maurice Davis, Maurice Daronte Davis and Maurice Daronte Davis Rogers
Defendant:
Meskath Vddin and Meskath Uddin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Rogers v. Matteson
as 2:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Maurice Di Aundra Rogers
Defendant:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
