Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Mooney v. Secretary of the CDCR
as 2:2013cv01165
Plaintiff:
Sean Mooney
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmor et al v. Preferred Credit Corporation
as 2:2013mc00036
Plaintiff:
Michael P Gilmor , Shellie Gilmor , Michael E Harris and others
Defendant:
Preferred Credit Corporation
Mooney v. Rios
as 1:2010cv02240
Petitioner:
Dennis J. Mooney
Respondent:
H.A. Rios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc. et al v. Practice MedX, LLC
as 2:2009at01398
Plaintiff:
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc., Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc., John M. Mooney and others
Defendant:
Practice MedX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc. et al v. Practice MedX, LLC
as 2:2009cv02436
Plaintiff:
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc., Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc., John M. Mooney and others
Defendant:
Practice MedX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Mooney v. Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc.
as 2:2009at01343
Defendant:
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc. and Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John M Mooney and John M Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc. et al v. Practice MedX, LLC
as 2:2009at01344
Plaintiff:
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc., Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc. and John M Mooney
Defendant:
Practice MedX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, et al v. Practice MedX
as 2:2009cv02358
Plaintiff:
Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc., Laser Allergy Relief Centers, Inc. and John M. Mooney
Defendant:
Practice MedX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miranda v. Mooney et al
as 1:2007cv00218
Plaintiff:
Javier Miranda
Defendant:
T. Mooney, - Figueroa, Wovick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
