Cases 21 - 30 of 1,805
(PC)Laguer v. Arreola et al
as 2:2024cv02120
Defendant:
L. Pantoja, H. Arreola, F. Correia and others
Plaintiff:
George A. Laguer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Chatman v. Duran et al
as 2:2024cv01929
Defendant:
H. Ortiz Zamora, J. Davis, B. Patillo and others
Plaintiff:
Audree Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024at00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01838
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Stephens v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2024cv01785
Defendant:
A. Espinoza, J. Schultz, M. Nunez and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Earl Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Solvey v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2024at00778
Plaintiff:
Stanley H. Solvey
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Anand Mehta, George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Solvey v. CDCR, et al
as 2:2024cv01756
Defendant:
George, Y. Mendoza, S. Gates and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley H. Solvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
BMO Bank N.A. v. H&R Transport, et al.
as 1:2024cv00710
Defendant:
H&R Transport and Harmandeep Singh Gill
Plaintiff:
BMO Bank N.A. and BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PC) Goss v. County of Fresno
as 1:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Thomas H. Goss
Defendant:
County of Fresno
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Gallegos v. Gunter et al
as 2:2024cv01674
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
Nikki Gunter, CDCR and H. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
