Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Bell v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2016cv02890
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Bell
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Cynthia Fritz and Mike Grottkau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saffold v. Brown, et al.
as 2:2016cv02829
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Saffold
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr. and Jennifer Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hart v. Brown, Jr. et al
as 1:2016cv01662
Petitioner:
John Hart
Respondent:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Jennifer Shaffer and Stu Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gay v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2016cv02533
Plaintiff:
Omar Sharrieff Gay
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Cliff Kusaj, Amy Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Victory v. Board of Parole Hearings et al
as 2:2016cv00997
Plaintiff:
Michael A Victory
Defendant:
Board of Parole Hearings and Jennifer Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andersen v. Montes et al
as 1:2016cv00236
Plaintiff:
Andrew S. Andersen
Defendant:
Marisela Montes, Tamiza Hockenhull, Nameeta Sahni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villacres v. California Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv00305
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Villacres
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections, California Board of Prison Hearings, California Office of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckstrom v. Beard et al
as 2:2016cv00275
Plaintiff:
Carl Eckstrom
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard and Jennifer Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Parole Hearings, Forensic Assessment Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bread, et al.
as 2:2015cv02269
Plaintiff:
Oshay Johnson
Defendant:
J. Bread, CDCR and Jennifer Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
