Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Carter v. Dawson et al
as 1:2007cv01325
Plaintiff:
Lon Carter
Defendant:
Nick Dawson, MD Bear, Pam Karr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Powers
as 1:2007cv01317
Petitioner:
Benjamin Melendrez Wilson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Avery v. Director of CDCR, et al.
as 1:2007cv01175
Plaintiff:
Shannon Lewis Avery, Sr.
Defendant:
Director of CDCR, G Gonzales, J. Amaya and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawthorne v. Mendoza-Power et al
as 1:2007cv01101
Plaintiff:
Ralph Kelly Hawthorne, Jr.
Defendant:
Kathy Mendoza-Power, S. K. Pennywell, J DonDiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Law v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00978
Petitioner:
Perry Jessie Law
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Farlough v. Garcia et al
as 1:2007cv00970
Plaintiff:
Dexter S.C. Farlough
Defendant:
Garcia, Blackford, Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00911
Petitioner:
Damien Coleman
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Mendoza-Powers
as 2:2007cv00929
Petitioner:
Jeff Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patterson v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00686
Petitioner:
Jeff Patterson
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Giovinco v. Mendoza-Powers
as 1:2007cv00585
Petitioner:
Frank Lorenzo Giovinco
Respondent:
Kathy Mendoza-Powers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
