Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Palos v. Sisto et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01261
Petitioner: Jesus Palos
Respondent: D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palos v. Sisto et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01709
Petitioner: Jesus Palos
Respondent: D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hayes v. Sisto We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01106
Petitioner: William Robert Hayes
Respondent: D. K. Sisto and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robb v. CSP-Solano Warden et al
as 2:2007cv00757
Petitioner: John Robb
Respondent: CSP-Solano Warden and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Drake v Felker, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00577
Petitioner: Dean Clay Drake
Respondent: Felker and Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Atty General of Ca
as 2:2000cv00766
Petitioner: Andre Smith, Sr
Respondent: Attorney General of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Small, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1999cv01821
Petitioner: Arthur Anderson
Respondent: Attorney General of California , M Yarbrough and Larry Small
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mendoza v. Beard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1998cv02150
Petitioner: Luis Mendoza
Respondent: Attorney General of California and Cal A Terhune
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?