Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Gray v. Finn
as 2:2007cv01513
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dee Gray
Respondent:
Claude Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv01470
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Lucas
Respondent:
Claude Finn and Board of Prison Hearings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucas v. Finn
as 2:2007cv01455
Petitioner:
Daniel R. Lucas
Respondent:
Claude Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Otton v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv01426
Petitioner:
Andrew Otton, Jr
Respondent:
Claude E. Finn and Edmund G Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kane v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv01120
Petitioner:
Morgan Kane
Respondent:
Claude Finn and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt vs Finn
as 2:2007cv01052
Petitioner:
Richard Dewayne Hunt
Respondent:
Claude Finn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Tilton et al
as 2:2007cv00614
Plaintiff:
Daniel Holland
Defendant:
James Tilton, C.E. Finn, S. R. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First American Loanstar v. Jorgensen, et al
as 2:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
First American Loanstar Trustee Services
Defendant:
Finn E. Jorgensen, Pascale M. Jorgensen, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
First American Loanstar Trustee Serviceserly v. Jorgensen et al
as 2:2007at00291
Plaintiff:
First American Loanstar Trustee Services
Defendant:
Finn E. Jorgensen, Pascale M. Jorgensen, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Miale v. Finn et al
as 2:2007cv00539
Plaintiff:
Martin Ross Miale
Defendant:
C E Finn and Attorney General for the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
