Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Claborn v. Swarthout
as 2:2011cv02112
Petitioner:
Jerry June Claborn
Respondent:
Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sand v. The Dancing Fox Winery and Bakery, Inc., et. al.
as 2:2011cv01581
Plaintiff:
June Sand
Defendant:
The Dancing Fox Winery and Bakery, Inc. and Gregg Lewis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Sand v. The Dancing Fox Winery and Bakery, Inc.
as 2:2011at00850
Plaintiff:
June Sand
Defendant:
The Dancing Fox Winery and Bakery, Inc. and Gregg Lewis
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Reed v. Haight et al
as 1:2011cv00926
Plaintiff:
Tanner June Reed
Defendant:
Douglas Darrell Haight and D & H Auto Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kreinzenbeck v. Hewlett-Packard
as 2:2011cv00904
Plaintiff:
June M. Kreinzenbeck
Defendant:
Hewlett-Packard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Asset Management, LLC v Coleman, et al.,
as 2:2010cv02287
Plaintiff:
National Asset Management, LLC
Defendant:
June Coleman , Ellis Coleman and Poirier, La Voie and Steinheimer, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Friends of Amador County, et al., v. Salazar
as 2:2010cv00348
Defendant:
Ken Salazar, Secretary of the US Department of Interior, United States Department of Interior and others
Plaintiff:
Friends of Amador County, Bea Crabtree and June Geary
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dukes v. Junes et al
as 2:2009cv02918
Plaintiff:
Melvin Dukes
Defendant:
B.E. Junes, Dunder, B. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dukes v. Junes, et al.,
as 2:2009cv02916
Petitioner:
Melvin Dukes
Respondent:
E.R. Junes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neyer v. GMAC Homecomings Financial Bank, et al.
as 2:2009cv01671
Plaintiff:
Leland Anthony Neyer and June E Neyer
Defendant:
GMAC Homecomings Financial Bank, Wes Lobo, Maria Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
