Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Motley v. Covello
as 2:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Edward Motley
Defendant:
Patrick Covello, Correctional Supervising Cook, Correctional Food Manager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Michael A. Yocom v. Newsom et al
as 1:2021cv00906
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Yocom
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, Bryan Yang, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. CHCF Stockton Medical Doctor
as 2:2018cv00943
Plaintiff:
Aloysius P. Franklin
Defendant:
CHCF Stockton Medical Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiskaden v. Corcoran Prison, et al.
as 1:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
Roger Kiskaden
Defendant:
- Corcoran Prison, Associate Wardens, Chief Medical Doctors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckman v. Chief Medical Doctor et al
as 1:2013cv01515
Plaintiff:
Tommy Curtis Eckman
Defendant:
Chief Medical Doctor, Jackson, Bueh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Goodrich et al
as 2:2011cv00854
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
- Goodrich, CMO and Medical Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Goodrich et al
as 1:2011cv00592
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
- Goodrich, CMO and Medical Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minear v. Taft FCI et al
as 1:2010cv00901
Plaintiff:
Sherry Minear
Defendant:
Taft FCI , Chief Medical Doctor Taft FCI and Unknown for Profit Contractor Managing Operations at FCI-TAFT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rendon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 1:2008cv00225
Plaintiff:
David Rendon
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Chief Medical Doctor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Pleasant Valley State Prison Medical Staff et al
as 1:2007cv01381
Plaintiff:
Fred Jason Wright
Defendant:
Pleasant Valley State Prison Medical Staff, Chief Medical Staff and Medical Doctors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
