Cases 1 - 10 of 27
(PC) Eslami v. Matteson et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Nathan Eslami
Defendant:
G. Matteson, T. Tyler, J. Cavagnolo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Trujillo v. CDCR et al
as 2:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Larry Trujillo
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, N. Malakka, A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022at01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kurita America, Inc. v. Hansen, et al.
as 1:2021cv00438
Defendant:
Paul Hansen, Trident Ag Technologies, Adam Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Kurita America, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Apollo Ag Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(HC) Pettie v. Thompson et al
as 2:2021cv02161
Petitioner:
Robert Pettie
Respondent:
Paul Thompson, Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Waddell v. Minton et al
as 2:2020cv00307
Defendant:
A. Minton, D Haynes, S. Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Waddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Mendoza v. Difuntorum et al
as 2:2019cv02272
Plaintiff:
John Gilbert Mendoza
Defendant:
A. Petty, M. McComas, G. Matteson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Chillis v. Neuschmid et al
as 2:2019cv00530
Plaintiff:
Marion Chilles and Marion Chillis
Defendant:
A. Petty, Scott Kernan, M. Voong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Hamilton v. Armstrong et al
as 2:2019cv00445
Defendant:
M Armstrong, Lee, Funforunn and others
Plaintiff:
Albert J. Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
