Cases 1 - 7 of 7
United States of America v. 42.35 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Kern County, California et al
as 1:2017cv00930
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
42.35 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in Kern County, California, Janet Thompson, George Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Strong Carpet Cleaning Systems, LLC et al v. STRONG AMERICAN DRY CARPET CLEANING TECHNOLOGY, LLC et al
as 2:2016at01464
Defendant:
STRONG AMERICAN DRY CARPET CLEANING TECHNOLOGY, LLC , BRUSH AND CLEAN, LLC , Marcus Agaton Wendt and others
Plaintiff:
Strong Carpet Cleaning Systems, LLC , Kelly Love and Michael Price
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Strong Carpet Cleaning Systems, LLC et al v. Strong American Dry Carpet Cleaning Technology, LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv02857
Defendant:
Strong American Dry Carpet Cleaning Technology, LLC , Brush and Clean, LLC , Marcus Agaton Wendt and others
Plaintiff:
Strong Carpet Cleaning Systems, LLC , Kelly Love and Michael Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
York v. Haviland et al
as 2:2009cv02896
Petitioner:
Thomas E. York
Respondent:
John H. Haviland, Robert Doyle, Lea Ann Chrones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephane Gerson, et al v. Wendt et al
as 1:2009cv01311
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Gerson, Alison Gerson and the Estate of Owen Gwerson by and through his successor in interest, Stephane Gerson
Defendant:
O.A.R.S. Canyonland, Inc. and George Wendt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
v. Wendt et al
as 1:2009at00584
Defendant:
George Wendt and George Wendt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pullen et al v. Victory Woodwork, Inc.
as 2:2007cv00417
Plaintiff:
Nick Pullen, Nick Pullen, Elizabeth Wendt and others
Defendant:
Victory Woodwork, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
