Cases 1 - 10 of 134
Dixon v. Tractor Supply Company
as 2:2024at00150
Plaintiff:
Thomas Loy Dixon
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Dixon v. Tractor Supply Company
as 1:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Thomas Loy Dixon
Defendant:
Tractor Supply Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PC) Lewis v. Phillip et al
as 1:2023cv01715
Plaintiff:
Paul Dixon Lewis
Defendant:
B. Phillip, J. Salinas and V. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Dixon et al v. Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dixon and Jeremy Wood
Defendant:
Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dixon et al v. Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
as 1:2023at00497
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dixon and Jeremy Wood
Defendant:
Oldcastle Infrastructure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Dixon Seed Corp. v. Green Co., Ltd.
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
Dixon Seed Corporation
Defendant:
Green Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Dixon Seed Corp. v. Green Co., Ltd.
as 2:2023at00082
Plaintiff:
Dixon Seed Corporation
Defendant:
Green Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
GS Holistic, LLC v. AA 110, et al
as 2:2022cv02034
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
AA 110 Doing business as Dixon Smoke Shop and Sayed Mehdizadeh
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
(PC) Wilson v. Beceigo et al
as 2:2022cv01768
Plaintiff:
Daniel Keith Wilson
Defendant:
Joanne Beceigo, John W. Lawerence, Karen Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
