Cases 21 - 30 of 466
Johnson:Bene v. Wells Fargo & Co. et al
as 4:2022cv06783
Plaintiff:
Sean-Lyons Johnson:Bene
Defendant:
Wells Fargo & Co., Michael P. Santomassimo, M. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In the Matter of Brian P. Moquin Bar No. 257583
as 3:2022mc80283
Respondent:
Brian P. Moquin
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Sackett v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv06081
Plaintiff:
Harvey P. Sackett
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Green Equitable Solutions et al
as 3:2022mc80247
Defendant:
Dominic Ahiga, Green Equitable Solutions a corporation agent of d/b/a Academy Home Services, South West Consulting Enterprises, Inc. agent of also d/b/a Academy Home Service, Atlantic Pacific Service Group, Golden Home Services of America Enterprises, and Home Matters USA and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and California Department of Financial Protection & Innovation
Receiver:
David P. Stapleton
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mendes et al
as 4:2022cv05340
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
John P. Mendes and Andre Dabbaghian
Bushansky v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04978
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Paul R. Auvil, Mark S. Blumenkranz and others
In re Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
as 4:2022mc80227
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Eddy v. Mercer et al
as 4:2022cv04342
Plaintiff:
Todd Eddy
Defendant:
Scott Mercer, Francois P. Chadwick, Christopher Wendel and others
Bushansky v. Prologis, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04320
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Prologis, Inc., Hamid R. Moghadam, Irving F. Lyons, III and others
Heil v. Ahelto et al
as 3:2022cv04239
Plaintiff:
Tom Heil
Defendant:
Eli Ahelto, Christopher Wendel, Vincent T. Cubbage and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
