Miller Act Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 190
United States for the Use and Benefit of MFRG Contractors, Inc. v. M. A. Mortenson Company et al
as 5:2024cv06122
Defendant: Travelers Casualty & Surety Company of America, Federal Insurance Company and M. A. Mortenson Company
Plaintiff: United States for the Use and Benefit of MFRG Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
McKee & Company Electric, Inc. v. Swinerton Builders, Inc.
as 3:2024cv05819
Defendant: Swinerton Builders, Inc.
Plaintiff: McKee & Company Electric, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The Don Chapin Company v. Ral Investment Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv04419
Defendant: Ral Investment Corporation a California corporation doing business as Silverstrand Construction and The Hanover Insurance Company
Plaintiff: The Don Chapin Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Bayview Industrial Services, Inc. v. Heffler Contracting Group et al
as 5:2024cv00807
Plaintiff: Bayview Industrial Services, Inc.
Defendant: Heffler Contracting Group and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
CAPITOL BUILDERS HARDWARE, INC. v. RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
as 5:2023cv05462
Plaintiff: Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc. and United States for the use of Capitol Builders Hardware, Inc.
Defendant: RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION, THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY and RAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION doing business as Silverstrand Construction, a California corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. et al v. Patriot Construction et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv04743
Plaintiff: DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc. and The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of DMS Drywall & Interior Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Patriot Construction and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Pace Supply Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al
as 4:2023cv04044
Plaintiff: Pace Supply Corp.
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and W. E. Lyons Construction Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc. v. Swinerton Builders et al
as 4:2023cv03019
Plaintiff: T.B. Penick & Sons, Inc.
Defendant: Swinerton Builders, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Zurich American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Karcher Insulation, Inc. v. S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., LLC. et al
as 5:2022cv06793
Plaintiff: The United States of America, for the use and benefit of Karcher Insulation, Inc.
Defendant: S.J. Amoroso Construction Co., LLC., Federal Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Boneso Brothers Construction, Inc. et al v. S.J. Amoroso Construction, Inc.
as 3:2022cv02271
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Boneso Brothers Construction, Inc. and Boneso Brothers Construction, Inc.
Defendant: S.J. Amoroso Construction, Inc., Federal Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?