Antitrust Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Wiebe et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv05332
Plaintiff: Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sandisk Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Wiebe et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al
as 4:2007cv05332
Plaintiff: Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe, Travis Wiebe and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Sandisk Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Flanagan v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv03068
Plaintiff: Donna Jeanne Flanagan
Defendant: AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
In Re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2007md01827
Defendant: Toshiba Mobile Display Company, Ltd., Sony Corporation, Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Tammy Long, Judd Eliasoph, Robert Harmon and others
Intervenor: Leah Nylen, Chris Donnelly, State of Mississippi and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn, Mr. Daniel Weinstein and Fern M Smith
Not Classified By Court: Julius N. Dunmore, Jr., Stefan Rest, Dale Keena and others
Counter Defendant: Rockwell Automation Inc., Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, Acer America Corporation and others
Interested Party: Douglas C. Giordan, Joseph M. Alioto, Alexandra Brudy and others
Counter Claimant: LG Display Co., Ltd. and LG Display America, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: State of South Carolina and State of California
Claimant: Tiffany and Company, CA Technologies, Inc., American University and others
Trustee: Charles W Daff
Petitioner: Fanshawe College of Applied Arts and Technology
3Rd Party Defendant: Ricoh Electronics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lambert et al v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
as 4:2007cv01656
Plaintiff: Mark Lambert, Mark Lambert, Mark Lambert and others
Defendant: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., Hynix Semiconductor Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant: Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified: Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor: David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party: James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master: Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff: Robin McEntee
In Re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other: Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff: Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor: Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court: norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant: Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner: Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified: Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Celestica Corporation
Special Master: Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant: Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent: Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?