Cases 111 - 120 of 2,341
Majo v. Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
as 3:2021cv09054
Plaintiff:
Emma Majo
Defendant:
Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Novoselac et al v. ISM Vuzem d.o.o. et al
as 5:2021cv08654
Plaintiff:
Stjepan Novoselac, Grega Povh, Davor Hudin and others
Defendant:
ISM Vuzem d.o.o., HRID-MONT d.o.o., Ivan Vuzem and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Campos v. Capital Building Maintenance & Cleaning Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv08571
Plaintiff:
Maria Campos
Defendant:
Capital Building Maintenance & Cleaning Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Detwiler v. Entelo, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07919
Plaintiff:
Zachary Detwiler
Defendant:
Entelo, Inc. and Jon Bischke
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marcelo et al v. Amazon.com,Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv07843
Plaintiff:
ELSON MARCELO, PETR BOGOPOLSKIY, JASON SALES and others
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM, INC., AMAZON LOGISTICS, INC. and Amazon.Com,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Petitt v. Exigency Healthcare Services, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv07639
Plaintiff:
Anietta C Petitt and Anietta C. Petitt
Defendant:
Exigency Healthcare Services, LLC, Felixberto O Matamis and Karen P Panilio
Castro et al v. Mach 1 Global Services, Inc.
as 3:2021cv07166
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Castro, Robert Sasser and Bryce Dixon
Defendant:
Mach 1 Global Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Washburn v. Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.
as 3:2021cv06472
Plaintiff:
Julie Washburn
Defendant:
Pendleton Woolen Mills, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Andersen v. Papa, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06326
Plaintiff:
Carice Ashley Andersen, Jennifer Pardo and Evangeline Matthews
Defendant:
Papa, Inc. and Papa Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez v. Northwest Cascade, Inc.
as 4:2021cv06150
Plaintiff:
Luis Lopez
Defendant:
Northwest Cascade, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
