Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Kane v. Matson Navigation Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv04583
Plaintiff:
Mark Kane
Defendant:
Matson Navigation Company, Inc. and Theodore E. Bernhard
Giles v. Canus Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv03097
Plaintiff:
Martinez Andre Giles
Defendant:
Canus Corporation and PG&E Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Giles v. Canus Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv03098
Plaintiff:
Martinez Andre Giles
Defendant:
Canus Corporation and PG&E Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Little v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Michael Little
Defendant:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Coverson v. Pacific Gas and Electric Company et al
as 4:2020cv05454
Defendant:
Pacific Gas and Electric Company and PG&E Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lonell Coverson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Franco v. E-3 Systems.
as 4:2019cv02854
Plaintiff:
Jose Franco
Defendant:
E-3 Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Franco v. E-3 Systems
as 4:2019cv01453
Plaintiff:
Jose Franco
Defendant:
E-3 Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roya v. Everport-Evergreen Terminal Services (EST)
as 3:2018cv06141
Defendant:
Davis Marcus, Everport Terminal Services, Inc., Andrews Michael and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Roya and Kevin Roya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roya v. International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 10 et al
as 3:2018cv06057
Defendant:
International Longshore and Warehouse Union, Local 10, Edward Henderson and Melvin Mackay
Plaintiff:
Kevin E. Roya and Kevin Roya
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Taylor v. Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department et al
as 3:2016cv03738
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Taylor
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Employment and Human Services Department, Renee Giometti and Cassandra O'Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
