Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Flora Bioscience, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03952
Plaintiff:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant:
Flora Bioscience, Inc., Robert Robbins and Marc Stoll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. Bush et al
as 4:2020cv06651
Defendant:
Arun Sarin, Michael D. Capellas, Lisa Su and others
Plaintiff:
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
Pradeep et al v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited
as 3:2015cv05229
Plaintiff:
A.K. Pradeep , Ratnakar Dev , Thomas Robbins and others
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company, Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC et al v. Razi
as 3:2012cv01954
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchising LLC , BR IP Holder LLC and DB Real Estate Assets I LLC
Defendant:
Syed Zia Razi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC et al v. Willhalm
as 5:2007cv05230
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops, LLC and others
Defendant:
John Willhalm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC et al v. Gill et al
as 3:2007cv02441
Plaintiff:
Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC, Baskin-Robbins Franchised Shops LLC and others
Defendant:
Sukpran Gill and Gurmeet Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Textainer Equipment Management (U.S.) Limited v. TRS Inc.
as 3:2007cv01519
Plaintiff:
Textainer Equipment Management (U.S.) Limited
Defendant:
TRS Inc., TRS Inc. and TRS Inc.
Mediator:
Patrick D. Robbins
Counter-claimant:
TRS Inc., TRS Inc. and TRS Inc.
Counter-defendant:
Textainer Equipment Management (U.S.) Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
