Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Keith Amaral et al v. Google Inc.
as 5:2016cv02553
Defendant:
Google Inc.
Plaintiff:
Keith Amaral , Nanor Aghamal , Jonathon Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv05117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lamb v. Bitech, Inc
as 3:2011cv05583
Plaintiff:
Jordan Lamb
Defendant:
Bitech, Inc a Delaware corporation doing business as Performance Bicycle Shop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statutes
Jordan et al v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 3:2014cv00787
Plaintiff:
Robert Jordan , Sean Halbert and Dana Skelton
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aldrich et al v. Prospect Mortgage, LLC
as 3:2013mc80151
Plaintiff:
Donna Aldrich , Jason Antypas , Valerie Avril-Kalili and others
Defendant:
Prospect Mortgage, LLC
Ferguson v. The Prophet Manasseh Jordan Ministries
as 5:2013cv02463
Plaintiff:
Bill Ferguson
Defendant:
The Prophet Manasseh Jordan Ministries
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Communications Act of 1994
Cox v. Hill et al
as 4:2013cv02046
Plaintiff:
Crystal L. Cox
Defendant:
Kashmir Hill, Forbes, Inc., Kevin D. Padrick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Troche et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gian Agosto Troche , Linda Albrecht , Crystal Apodaca and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maze et al v. National Collegiate Athletic Association et al
as 3:2010cv05569
Plaintiff:
Bobby C. Maze and Jordan Dixon
Defendant:
National Collegiate Athletic Association, Collegiate Licensing Company, Electronic Arts, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
