Cases 21 - 25 of 25
In re: Volkswagen "Clean Diesel" Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 3:2015md02672
Plaintiff:
Steven Racine, Winston Allart, Marisa Garcia and others
Not Yet Classified:
Chadwick Burgdorff, Daniel Fernandez Abad, Christian Kleine and others
Defendant:
Robert H. Kim, Scott Harrison, Volkswagen of Downtown LA LP and others
Other:
Corey Tate, Andres Lujan, Maria C. Martinez-Diaz and others
Interested Party:
Sandra Underwood, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality and Serra Traverse City, LLC
Petitioner:
Barry A. Debevec, Puerto Rico Government Employees and Judiciary Retirement Systems Administration, Chris Green and others
Special Master:
Robert S. Mueller, III
Claimant:
Mr. Edward L Allen and William Ballew
Respondent:
Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Corcoran et al v. CVS Health Corporation
as 4:2015cv03504
Plaintiff:
Carl Washington, Carolyn Caine, Stephen Sullivan and others
Defendant:
CVS Health and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv01783
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation , Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Global Sales, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Ploof v. United States of America Department of The Interior Bureau of Land Management et al
as 4:2009cv03736
Plaintiff:
Donald George Ploof
Defendant:
United States of America Department of The Interior Bureau of Land Management, Napa County Sheriff's Department, County of Napa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Pacific Bell Telephone Company v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv01107
Plaintiff:
Pacific Bell Telephone Company
Defendant:
Clark Realty Builders, LP, Clark Realty Builders, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
