Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03487
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Biondi v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv02128
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
David Biondi
Litwin v. The Michaels Companies, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv02051
Defendant:
The Michaels Companies, Inc., John J. Mahoney, Beryl B. Raff and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Litwin
Toronto v. Silbermann et al
as 3:2020cv09390
Defendant:
Fredric Reynolds, Benjamin Silbermann, Pinterest, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sal Toronto
The Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island, derivatively on behalf of PINTEREST, INC. v. Silbermann et al
as 3:2020cv08438
Defendant:
Benjamin Silbermann, Evan Sharp, Fredric Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
The Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island, derivatively on behalf of PINTEREST, INC. and The Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island
Bushansky v. Silbermann et al
as 3:2020cv08331
Defendant:
Jeremy Levine, Pinterest, Inc., Evan Sharp and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Interested Party:
Sal Toronto
Petitioner:
The Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island
Levin Richmond Terminal Corporation et al v. City of Richmond et al
as 4:2020cv01609
Plaintiff:
Richmond Pacific Railroad Corporation, Levin Enterprises, Inc. and Levin Richmond Terminal Corporation
Defendant:
City Council of the City of Richmond and City of Richmond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Levine v. Saucey, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00548
Defendant:
Saucey,Inc.
Plaintiff:
Deitria Levine
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Duvnjak v. Box, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03173
Defendant:
Box, Inc., Daniel J. Levin, Aaron Levie and others
Plaintiff:
Simo Duvnjak
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
