Cases 1 - 10 of 2,283
M. H. v. Done Global Inc
as 3:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
M. H.
Defendant:
Done Global Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02982
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
H v. Uber Technologies Inc et al
as 3:2024cv02903
Plaintiff:
A H
Defendant:
Uber Technologies Inc, Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rosales v. Nathan
as 4:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosales
Defendant:
Paul H. Nathan, Jr.
Counter Claimant:
Paul H Nathan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
M. H. v. Hain Celestial Group Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02827
Plaintiff:
M. H.
Defendant:
Hain Celestial Group, Inc., Gerber Products Company and 1-50 Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kimner v. Davila et al
as 4:2024cv02750
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Defendant:
Edward J. Davila, Lucy H. Koh, Nathanael Cousins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC v. Nickel et al
as 3:2024cv02574
Plaintiff:
J.P. Morgan Private Wealth Advisors LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, First Republic Investment Management, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mark R. Nickel, Brian J. Addington, Mark A. Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
