Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Boston Robotic Hair Restoration, PLLC et al v. Venus Concept Inc.
as 4:2021cv07933
Plaintiff:
Boston Robotic Hair Restoration, PLLC and Melissa R. Schneider, M.D., PC
Defendant:
Venus Concept Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jiang v. New Millennium Concepts Inc.
as 3:2015cv04722
Plaintiff:
Li Jiang
Defendant:
New Millennium Concepts Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gonzalez v. Social Concepts, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01719
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel C. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Social Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Boards of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Trust et al v. Efficient Energy Concepts, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01000
Plaintiff:
Boards of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Health Care Trust , Sheet Metal Workers Pension Trust of Northern California , Sheet Metal Workers Local 104 Supplemental Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Efficient Energy Concepts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Fogarty, M.D. et al
as 4:2013cv05936
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Fogarty, Fogarty Engineering Inc, Cardiovascular Concepts Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Yost et al v. Black & Decker (US), Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv05203
Plaintiff:
Arthur R Yost , Erika Yost and Energy Concepts, Inc.
Defendant:
Black & Decker (US), Inc. and Rohm Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
