Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Severs v. Garcia et al
as 3:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Catherine Severs
Defendant:
Carlos Garcia, HYP3R MEDIA INC. and Hyp3r Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mccausland et al v. PepsiCo, Inc.
as 5:2023cv04526
Plaintiff:
IAN MCCAUSLAND, Carlo Garcia and Michael Zurl
Defendant:
PEPSICO, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv03889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Garcia-Gomez v. USA
as 3:2018cv07536
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Garcia-Gomez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Garcia v. Kernan et al
as 3:2017cv01455
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garcia
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Shawn Hatton, S. Camara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marshall et al v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 3:2013cv02757
Plaintiff:
Brandon Marshall , Sharon Jones , Juanita Valadez and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. Cate
as 3:2012cv01760
Petitioner:
Carlos Garcia
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez et al v. Hirbod et al
as 3:2011cv04593
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Hernandez , Waldemar Modesto Gomez , Henry Franklin Martinez and others
Defendant:
Sam Hirbod, Bedrock Oil, Inc.,, C & P Services, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hernandez et al v. Hirbod et al
as 4:2011cv04593
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Hernandez , Waldemar Modesto Gomez , Henry Franklin Martinez and others
Defendant:
Sam Hirbod, Bedrock Oil, Inc.,, C & P Services, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McDonald v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2009cv01181
Plaintiff:
Adam McDonald
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States District Court, Northern District of California, Phyllis J. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
