Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California
Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Rosario v. Natividad Medical Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv01598
Plaintiff: LaChauraleighn Rosario
Defendant: Natividad Medical Center, Miguel Acuna, M.D., Christopher Martin, M.D and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Provincial Court of Zaragoza, Section Two, Spain, in ADICAE
as 3:2023mc80240
In Re: In Re: Request for International Judicial Assistance from the Provincial Court of Zaragoza, Section Two, Spain, in ADICAE v. Luis Domingo Neyra Rambau, et al
Not Classified By Court: Automattic, Inc.
Teague v. Bayer-Bayer
as 3:2023cv04605
Plaintiff: JaRon Shawn La'V Teague
Defendant: Bayer-Bayer eT, AL.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MED et al, Inc. v. Impresa Products, LLC
as 4:2023cv03574
Plaintiff: MED et al, Inc.
Defendant: Impresa Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al et al v. CloudFlare, Inc. et al
as 3:2023mc80162
Plaintiff: In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al, Shueisha Inc., Shogakukan Inc. and others
Defendant: CloudFlare, Inc. and Google LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv01287
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul, Republic of Korea In The Matter of Ahin Park v. Unknown et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023mc80016
Plaintiff: In Re: Request for Judicial Assistance from the Seoul Central District Court in Seoul, Republic of Korea In The Matter of Ahin Park v. Unknown et al.
Petitioner: United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00068
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Caswell County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07038
Plaintiff: Caswell County, North Carolina et al, CITY OF GREENSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA, DAVIE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022mc80273
Plaintiff: In Re Ex Parte Application of Shueisha Inc. et al, Shueisha Inc., Shogakukan Inc. and others
Defendant: PayPal Holdings, Inc., Mastercard International Incorporated, Google, LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?