Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Montoya v. GoPro Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04082
Plaintiff:
Miguel Montoya
Defendant:
GoPro Inc. and ACME
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Contour IP Holding, LLC v. GoPro, Inc.
as 3:2021cv02143
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Contour IP Holding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
GoPro, Inc. v. Allied Sunny Ltd. et al
as 3:2019cv01004
Defendant:
PRO-mounts International B.V., Allied Sunny Ltd., F.E.N.S. Kiddy Trends B.V. and others
Plaintiff:
GoPro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
American GNC Corporation v. GoPro, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv06778
Plaintiff:
American GNC Corporation
Defendant:
Robert Bosch GmbH, Bosch Sensortec GmbH and GoPro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd. et al v. GoPro, Inc.
as 3:2018cv05923
Plaintiff:
Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd., Blackmagic Design Inc. and Blackmagic Design Technology Inc.
Defendant:
GoPro, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
ViXS Systems Inc. v. GOPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation
as 3:2018cv03569
Defendant:
GOPRO, INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff:
ViXS Systems Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al
as 5:2018md02834
Defendant:
PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC et al, Airbnb, Inc., Stitchfix, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Level 3 Communications, LLC, PersonalWeb Technologies, LLC, Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Romero v. Woodman et al
as 3:2018cv01284
Plaintiff:
Mario Romero
Defendant:
Nicholas Woodman, Brian Mcgee, Anthony Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Guo v. Woodman et al
as 4:2018cv00920
Defendant:
Kenneth Goldman, Brian McGee, Peter Gotcher and others
Plaintiff:
Wenduo Guo
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mario Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ladd v. Woodman et al
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Nicholas Woodman , Brian McGee and GoPro, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Larry Ladd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
