Cases 1 - 10 of 5,149
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Meta Platforms Inc.
as 3:2024mc80137
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Meta Platforms Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
M v. United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons) et al
as 4:2024cv03337
Plaintiff:
C M
Defendant:
United States of America (Federal Bureau of Prisons), Ray J. Garcia and Darrell Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Singh et al v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 3:2024cv03293
Plaintiff:
Daryn M. Singh, Deepak Singh and Lila Singh
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Dat Le v. Pham et al
as 5:2024cv01996
Plaintiff:
Nguyen Dat Le
Defendant:
United States of America, Casper Pharma LLC, Casper Pharma Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
