Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Song et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01209
Plaintiff:
Young Song and Hyun Ju Kim
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Does 1 through 50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Spectrum Energy Solutions, Inc. et al v. Shell Energy North America (US), L.P. et al
as 3:2017cv00969
Plaintiff:
Spectrum Energy Solutions, Inc. and Michael Jennings
Defendant:
Shell Energy North America (US), L.P. and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ocean SW, Inc. et al v. Canam Pet Treats, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02059
Plaintiff:
Ocean SW, Inc. and U.S. Pet Nutrition, LLC
Defendant:
Canam Pet Treats, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medivet-America, LLC v. Vet-Stem, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00498
Plaintiff:
Medivet-America, LLC
Defendant:
Vet-Stem, Inc., Personalized Stem Cells, Inc., Bob Harman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sakkab v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00436
Plaintiff:
Shukri Sakkab
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America Inc. and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Juhline v. Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.
as 3:2011cv02906
Plaintiff:
Steve Juhline
Defendant:
Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc. and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
California Valley Miwok Tribe v. California Gambling Control Commission et al
as 3:2008cv00120
Plaintiff:
California Valley Miwok Tribe
Defendant:
California Gambling Control Commission and DOES 1 through 50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1362 Indian Tribal Controversy
Jones v. Carrizo Gorge, et al
as 3:2005cv01934
Plaintiff:
Barry Jones
Defendant:
Carrizo Gorge Railway, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
