Cases 61 - 70 of 204
Helems v. Nutrabio Labs, INC.
as 3:2022cv00870
Plaintiff:
Jesse Helems
Defendant:
Nutrabio Labs, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Weinholtz v. Evlution Nutrition LLC
as 3:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Silver Weinholtz
Defendant:
Evlution Nutrition LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
Frengel et al v. McLaren Automotive, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Ralph Thomas Frengel and Ralph Frengel
Defendant:
McLaren Automotive, Inc., Does 1 to 10, O'Gara Coach Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bw Diversity -Breach of Warranty
Georges v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00617
Plaintiff:
Safa Georges
Defendant:
BMW of North America, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Saldivar v. FCA US, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Joel Saldivar
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Brand v. Slimfast Foods Company
as 3:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Kasama Brand
Defendant:
Slimfast Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Morel v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 3:2021cv01806
Plaintiff:
Angela Morel
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 Through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Romoff v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
as 3:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Robert Romoff
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Master-Broker, LLC v. EMU Australia (USA) Inc.
as 3:2021cv01273
Plaintiff:
Master-Broker, LLC
Defendant:
EMU Australia (USA) Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc
Mapes et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00870
Plaintiff:
Alicia Mapes and Gordon Mapes
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
