Cases 161 - 170 of 4,080
Ottinger v. Gilley et al
as 3:2022cv00633
Petitioner:
Michael Ottinger
Respondent:
Gilley and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Allison
as 3:2022cv00742
Petitioner:
Donald R. Lewis
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vailes v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00456
Petitioner:
Murrel Wayne Vailes, III
Respondent:
Warden R.C. Johnson and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGlory v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv00655
Petitioner:
Ladedrick Lequan McGlory
Respondent:
Neill McDowell and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dorsey v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00583
Petitioner:
Deshawn C. Dorsey
Respondent:
R.C. Johnson and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryson v. Madden et al
as 3:2022cv00556
Petitioner:
Ronald Bryson
Respondent:
Raymond Madden and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galvan v. Montgomery
as 3:2022cv00330
Petitioner:
Juan Galvan
Respondent:
W. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Lynch et al
as 3:2022cv00455
Petitioner:
Ms. Paul Anthony Lynch
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lovejoy v. Pallares
as 3:2022cv00267
Petitioner:
Diana Lovejoy
Respondent:
Michael Pallares
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Atchley
as 3:2022cv00363
Petitioner:
Ronnie Jones
Respondent:
M Atchley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.