Cases 1 - 10 of 140
Manago v. Cueva et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Pratt
as 3:2023cv02175
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Jones v. High Desert State Prison
as 3:2023cv00774
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
High Desert State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Supreme Court
as 3:2023cv00238
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Oceanside Police Department
as 3:2023cv00237
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
Oceanside Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. City of Oceanside et al
as 3:2023cv00240
Petitioner:
Wayne E. Jones
Respondent:
City of Oceanside and Oceanside Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turley v. Peterson
as 3:2023cv00123
Petitioner:
Macey E. Turley
Respondent:
A. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montoya v. Cueva, et al
as 3:2022cv00410
Petitioner:
Louis Shawn Montoya, Jr.
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Holbrook
as 3:2021cv01879
Petitioner:
Cedric E. Walker, Sr.
Respondent:
D. Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
