Cases 131 - 140 of 4,578
Bazzo v. State of California et al
as 3:2023cv01707
Plaintiff:
Frank Monaco Bazzo
Defendant:
State of California, CDCR, Kathleen Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Unknown Defendants
as 3:2023cv01684
Plaintiff:
Archie Tyrell Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Hackenberg et al
as 3:2023cv01679
Plaintiff:
Tom Blake
Defendant:
W. Hackenberg and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith Arizmendez v. McCourt
as 3:2023cv01625
Plaintiff:
Issac L. Smith Arizmendez
Defendant:
Daniel McCourt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Lopez
as 3:2023cv01628
Plaintiff:
Ryan A. Meeks
Defendant:
Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Murillo v. McVay et al
as 3:2023cv01581
Plaintiff:
Mona S. Murillo
Defendant:
CDCR, M. McVay, CDCR Medical Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Pulu v. Costa et al
as 3:2023cv01582
Plaintiff:
Moses Pulu
Defendant:
A. Costa, M. McVay and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Macomber et al
as 3:2023cv01575
Plaintiff:
Marcus Brent Fields
Defendant:
Jeffery Macomber, Kathleen Allison, S. Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Legaspy-Chacon v. The County of High Desert to San Diego and Back Down et al
as 3:2023cv01569
Plaintiff:
Miguel Alberto Legaspy-Chacon
Defendant:
The County of High Desert to San Diego and Back Down, Jasmine Hernandez, Charlie Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ndandu v. Alvarado et al
as 3:2023cv01531
Plaintiff:
Tresor Maleka Ndandu
Defendant:
Alvarado, Almager, A. Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
