Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Franklin v. Rural/Metro of San Diego, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv01149
Plaintiff:
Phillip Franklin
Defendant:
Rural/Metro of San Diego, Inc., Credence Resource Management, LLC and DOES 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Franklin v. Reynolds, Jensen, Swan & Pershing, LLP et al
as 3:2018cv01022
Plaintiff:
Barbara Franklin
Defendant:
Reynolds, Jensen, Swan & Pershing, LLP and Philip Supina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ingalls v. AMG Demolition & Environmental Services et al
as 3:2017cv02013
Plaintiff:
Todd Ingalls
Defendant:
AMG Demolition & Environmental Services , Kelly & Assoc., Inc., Balfour Beatty Construction, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6972
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abazari v. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science et al
as 3:2016cv01329
Plaintiff:
Armin Abazari
Defendant:
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Dr. William M. Scholl, College of Podiatric Medicine and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franklin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 3:2014cv02349
Plaintiff:
Lillian Franklin
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv02864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Samuelson et al v. State of California
as 3:2013cv01306
Plaintiff:
Lucina B. Samuelson and David Franklin Taylor
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Andrews et al v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2013cv00268
Plaintiff:
George Andrews and Franklin Andrews
Defendant:
The United States of America and U.S. Coast Guard Agents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
