Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Edward J. Schwartz, Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv02697
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, U. S. Grant Plaza Hotel, Navy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv01271
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Plaza Hotel, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00425
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, San Diego County Public Defender, C-SPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Grant v. Capital Management Services, L.P. et al
as 3:2010cv02471
Plaintiff:
Wade Grant
Defendant:
Capital Management Services, L.P. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Calhoun v. San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners et al
as 3:2010cv02049
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego County and All of Its Corrupt Partners, Irma E Gonzalez , Dana Sabraw and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Teeple et al v. Hirou et al
as 3:2008cv02281
Plaintiff:
Grant G. Teeple and Teeple Hall, LLP.
Defendant:
Bradley A. Hirou, Ronald W. Banks and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
