Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. v. Bumble Bee Foods LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02154
Plaintiff:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
Bumble Bee Foods, LLC, Starkist Company, Dongwon Industries, Co. LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Dorfman v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01596
Plaintiff:
Robert Dorfman
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IN RE: PACKAGED SEAFOOD PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 3:2015md02670
Plaintiff:
Truyen Ton-Vuong, Steven Kratky, Melissa Bowman and others
Defendant:
Big Catch Cayman LP, Dongwon Enterprises Co. Ltd., Chicken of the Sea International, Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party Costco Wholesale Corporation, Lion Capital LLP and Christopher Lischewski
Intervenor Plaintiff:
United States Department of Justice
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Affiliated Foods Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Harris v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01343
Plaintiff:
Leo Harris
Thirdparty_defendant:
Advanced Botanical Consulting & Testing, Inc.
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vaccaro v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00174
Plaintiff:
David Vaccaro
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kirby v. CVS Caremark Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv01517
Plaintiff:
Georgiana Kirby
Defendant:
CVS Caremark Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
