Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Griffin v. CBS Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv01667
Plaintiff:
Sarah Griffin
Defendant:
CBS Corporation , General Electric Company , IMO Industries Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pi Removal- Personal Injury
White v. Universal Protections et al
as 3:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Ennis E. White
Defendant:
Universal Protections, Thomas Szotek #4790 and Metropolitan Transit System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isaman v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2016cv01237
Plaintiff:
Timothy E. Isaman
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mohn v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2016cv00711
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Mohn
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michel v. United States Customs and Border Protection, et al.
as 3:2016cv00277
Plaintiff:
Doyma Vanessa Michel
Defendant:
United States Customs and Border Protection , B. Gibbons, E. Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Turner v. Novo Nordisk Inc.
as 3:2016cv00238
Plaintiff:
Wayman E. Turner
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richey-Smith v. Carl Warren & Company
as 3:2015cv02889
Plaintiff:
Margo E. Richey-Smith
Defendant:
Carl Warren & Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00857
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Bennett
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Janssen Ortho, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peggy Hartzog et al v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00792
Plaintiff:
Peggy Hartzog and Clyde E. Hartzog
Defendant:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Woltz v. Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00679
Plaintiff:
Melissa E. Woltz
Defendant:
Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Eli Lilly and Company and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
