Cases 111 - 120 of 12,089
Starr v. Covello et al
as 3:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Ciara Sky Starr
Respondent:
Patrick Covello and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Imperial, San Diego, and Alameda County Superior Courts
as 3:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Imperial, San Diego, and Alameda County Superior Courts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Pratt et al
as 3:2024cv00232
Petitioner:
Martin Ponce Ramirez
Defendant:
Rob Bonta
Respondent:
Glenn E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Defendant:
San Diego County, North County Division, San Diego County's Jails and Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Eric Michael Drake
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Office of Internal Affairs (OIA)
as 3:2023cv02242
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
Office of Internal Affairs (OIA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. The People et al
as 3:2023cv02243
Petitioner:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Respondent:
The People and D.A. Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. USA
as 3:2024cv00177
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Sanchez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tyler v. Doctor Lu
as 3:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Claudie Tyler
Defendant:
Doctor Lu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02249
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
