Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bowman Muhamed et al v. CDCR Medical ect Mental Health et al
as 3:2017cv01115
Plaintiff:
Jerry Bowman Muhamed
Defendant:
CDCR Medical ect Mental Health, Correctional Officer Staff, Unknown, and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Suen v. Ryan et al
as 3:2015cv02610
Plaintiff:
David F. Suen
Defendant:
T. Ryan, D. Dominguez, F. S. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Childs v. Californa, State of et al
as 3:2015cv02385
Plaintiff:
Earl Childs
Defendant:
Californa, State of, C. Covel, R.J.D.C.F. "D. Yard" Officials and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Legaspy v. Armenta et al
as 3:2013cv00301
Plaintiff:
Miguel Legaspy
Defendant:
AW Armenta, Robert Hernandez and Nursing Personel Correctional Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Unknown Correctional Officer # 1 et al
as 3:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Defendant:
Unknown Correctional Officer # 1, Unknown Correctional Officer # 2 and Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galeano v. Uribe et al
as 3:2011cv01018
Plaintiff:
Alexander Galeano
Defendant:
Domingo Uribe, Jr., Sgt Ramirez, C. Parkhill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Noonan et al
as 3:2011cv00174
Plaintiff:
Thomas A Moore
Defendant:
E Noonan , Hospital Service Administrator , Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Covarsia Dill v. Ives et al
as 3:2010cv01494
Plaintiff:
Covarsia Dill
Defendant:
Ives, Barnhart, Amstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Sandor et al
as 3:2010cv00619
Petitioner:
Wilbur Lann Pittman
Respondent:
G Sandor , D Pearson , Warden's Correction Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dexter v. Correctional Officer et al
as 3:2009cv00593
Plaintiff:
Harvey James Dexter, Jr.
Defendant:
Correctional Officer and Correctional Officer
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
