Cases 51 - 60 of 155
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Garrett v. Baughman et al
as 3:2016cv03100
Petitioner:
William Allen Garrett
Respondent:
David Baughman and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Kernon et al
as 3:2016cv03102
Petitioner:
Mychal Andra Reed
Respondent:
Scott Kernon and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosales v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2016cv00869
Petitioner:
Fernando Rosales
Respondent:
Felix Vasquez and Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kenniston v. Macdonald et al
as 3:2015cv02683
Petitioner:
Kevin Kenniston
Respondent:
J. Macdonald and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02090
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
as 3:2015cv01344
Plaintiff:
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Attorney General State of California
as 3:2015cv00620
Petitioner:
Randy Tucker
Respondent:
Attorney General State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Attorney General of the State of California
as 3:2015cv00385
Petitioner:
Elenar L. Garcia
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Paramo et al
as 3:2014cv02405
Petitioner:
Edward Jones
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Attorney General of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
