Cases 81 - 90 of 166
Miracle v. Paramo et al
as 3:2013cv01487
Petitioner:
Alan James Miracle
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norton v. Valenzuela et al
as 3:2013cv01485
Petitioner:
Johnny Lee Norton
Respondent:
E. Valenzuela and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burton v. Paramo et al
as 3:2013cv01459
Petitioner:
Raysheon Marquise Burton
Respondent:
D. Paramo and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Galliher v. Cash et al
as 3:2013cv01345
Petitioner:
Steven James Galliher
Respondent:
Brenda M. Cash and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wanton v. Virga et al
as 3:2013cv01240
Petitioner:
Gregory Wanton
Respondent:
Tim Virga and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dumlao v. Cates et al
as 3:2013cv01190
Petitioner:
Romeo Balbin Dumlao, Jr.
Respondent:
Matthew C. Cates and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunsmore v. Paramo et al
as 3:2013cv01193
Petitioner:
Darryl Dunsmore
Respondent:
Paramo and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Hill et al
as 3:2013cv01191
Petitioner:
Gildardo Rodriguez
Respondent:
Rick Hill and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Meade v. Diaz et al
as 3:2013cv01183
Petitioner:
Andre Brian Meade
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lynch v. Price et al
as 3:2013cv01148
Petitioner:
Lee Roy Lynch
Respondent:
Price and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
