Cases 1 - 10 of 221
Tucker v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Brezell Tucker
Defendant:
G. Gonzalez, H. Trillo, F. Camacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Moore v. Espinoza et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Moore
Defendant:
G. Espinoza, J. Moss, H. Para and others
Debtor:
Rivas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Nunez, J. Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Buckel et al
as 3:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Mychal Reed
Defendant:
A. Buckel, S. Steadman, T. Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo et al
as 3:2023cv02098
Plaintiff:
Alfred E. Shallowhorn
Defendant:
J. Carrillo, F. Guzman, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramsey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv01920
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Ramsey
Defendant:
N. Thompson and H. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Downs v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv02073
Petitioner:
Wendy H. Downs
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramsey v. Corronado et al
as 3:2022cv01859
Plaintiff:
Daniel Chris Ramsey
Defendant:
J. Corronado, G. Ortiz and H. Moseley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
