Cases 1 - 10 of 1,137
Arguello v. John Doe et al
as 3:2024cv01024
Plaintiff:
Israel Arguello
Defendant:
John Doe and J. Agredano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Castillo v. Doe 1-100 et al
as 3:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Arturo Marcelino Castillo
Defendant:
John Doe 1-100, Jane Doe 1-100 and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonilla v. Hayes et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
William Q. Hayes, John A. Houston, Judge Bernard G. Skomal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Arguello v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00937
Plaintiff:
Israel Arguello
Defendant:
John Doe and J. Agredano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Newsom et al
as 3:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
John W. Williams
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Jeffrey Macomber, Tammy Foss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardy v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hardy
Defendant:
A. Silva and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TerVeer v. Cuevas + the People et al
as 3:2024cv00847
Petitioner:
Justin TerVeer
Respondent:
Cuevas + the People and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canady v. Figuera et al
as 3:2024cv00752
Plaintiff:
John Fitzgerald Canady
Defendant:
Ivan Figuera, Paola Castro, Shelly Amador and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Paramo et al
as 3:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, Marcus Pollard, M. Hagemann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bibbs v. Lewis et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Martin J. Bibbs
Defendant:
Mrs. Lewis, Davies, Mr. Banvelos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
